In reply to climber_Ken:
Best is to select the most appropriate and specific forecasting model for the specific area, which is usually the model with the highest grid cell resolution and shortest forecast duration (obviously a long‑term model is less precise than a 24h one, as is one with 30km2 cells compared to 2km2 cells) and check that it has the proper elevation for the place (lots of generic services like Yr's historically sucked at that outside of their own countries scope, with e.g. Yr not showing proper wind speed at summit elevations for Alps).
Yr is in Norway, so they might only use a more generic lower resolution ECMWF outside of that. Or they might have licensed ICON2 as well nowadays (no idea), but it's still important to check what the actual model is used for the location in question on the service you use, as the less precise models obviously don't model the local topography as well, due to lower resolution (supercomputer time is expensive).
Meteoblue by default uses a weighted combination of data from all the other models, but that might not be always that useful for mountaineering. Thankfully, Meteoblue also has a nifty customisable "multimodel" forecast graph showing the other models and also showing the elevation the model's forecast is set at for the location, see the link below for e.g. Brenta.
Windy.com also allows you to select different models and compare them, although it might have less of them.
The best ones for mountains might be ICON2 from Deutscher Wetterdienst for the German/Austrian Alps (and some Dolomites), METEO France's AROME2 in French Alps and Pyrenees, UKMO2 in the UK (no idea). Usually the most detailed ones are by the and for each country you are in – although I'd guess that something like Albanian Meteorological Institute might not have the exact same near‑unlimited computing resources as their German equivalent...
And while you could get the same ICON2 forecast data from Deutscher Wetterdienst I guess, Meteoblue might have it available in a more accessible manner for more places.
https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/forecast/multimodel/cima-brenta_italy_...
Disclaimer: I am not a meteorologist. Just interested in it.
For avalanches, EAWS's https://www.avalanches.org has links to all the local avalanche risk forecasts and bulletins made by all its members.
Post edited at 17:25
