In reply to jwi:
> Is the Lappnor Project infamous? Why? What is the bad quality it is known for?
It appears Nathaniel who wrote the article is from Singapore or maybe Malaysia so English might not be his first language, or at least not his only language. Nevertheless had I been editing I don't see anything wrong with using that word. He hasn't called Burden infamous, he called the project before completion infamous. There is other bouldering at Lappnor that long predates Burden, so it wasn't like Nalle's project was a secret. From memory, and any Finn can correct me on this, it was known that he had been trying the project for several years before doing it, because the team that made the Kylmää kiveä film were working with Nalle to film his attempts. So the multi year siege makes it infamous.
I've bouldered at Lappnor but back then I'm not sure the Burden boulder had been discovered but friends who are decent boulderers themselves who have been there since, say when you are under it, touch the holds and feel the steepness it just seems utterly ridiculous that anyone thought they could climb that. So infamous for it's brutality and preposterousness, as well, perhaps!