Rockfax Description
The next narrow face. Using the crack drops the grade. © Rockfax
User | Date | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
hayleylouisesmith | 28 Jun, 2020 |
Show βeta
βeta: Nice route, only mildly fluttery move at the top. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Nice route, only mildly fluttery move at the top. |
||||
Iain Thow | 6 Apr, 2007 |
Show βeta
βeta: Worth a star, but also worth severe if you ignore the crack | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: Worth a star, but also worth severe if you ignore the crack |
||||
Simon Caldwell | 4 Dec, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: I went up the left crack and then continued straight on up the face above. Seemed a logical route, maybe pushing VDiff for the final moves, and worth a star. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: I went up the left crack and then continued straight on up the face above. Seemed a logical route, maybe pushing VDiff for the final moves, and worth a star. |
||||
Offwidth | 25 Nov, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: The face has hidden holds. The route must take these, not the cracks. Both are VD if you place runners in the left crack doing the face route. | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: The face has hidden holds. The route must take these, not the cracks. Both are VD if you place runners in the left crack doing the face route. |
||||
Monk | 31 May, 2003 |
Show βeta
βeta: I think this route goes up the face left of the cracks. This is a reasonable route and fits the name better. Why would you call parallel cracks a face? | βeta? | |
Show beta
βeta: I think this route goes up the face left of the cracks. This is a reasonable route and fits the name better. Why would you call parallel cracks a face? |
Please Login to view more details on the logged ascents