12m. Feedback
Rockfax Description
The next face. Using the (unavoidable?) crack drops the grade. © Rockfax
Feedback
| User | Date | Notes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| hayleylouisesmith | 28 Jun |
Show βeta
βeta: Nice route, only mildly fluttery move at the top. | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: Nice route, only mildly fluttery move at the top. |
|||
| Iain Thow | 6 Apr, 2007 |
Show βeta
βeta: Worth a star, but also worth severe if you ignore the crack | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: Worth a star, but also worth severe if you ignore the crack |
|||
| Iggy_B | 9 May, 2005 |
Show βeta
βeta: Easiest of the lot. | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: Easiest of the lot. |
|||
| Simon Caldwell | 4 Dec, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: I went up the left crack and then continued straight on up the face above. Seemed a logical route, maybe pushing VDiff for the final moves, and worth a star. | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: I went up the left crack and then continued straight on up the face above. Seemed a logical route, maybe pushing VDiff for the final moves, and worth a star. |
|||
| Offwidth | 25 Nov, 2004 |
Show βeta
βeta: The face has hidden holds. The route must take these, not the cracks. Both are VD if you place runners in the left crack doing the face route. | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: The face has hidden holds. The route must take these, not the cracks. Both are VD if you place runners in the left crack doing the face route. |
|||
| Monk | 31 May, 2003 |
Show βeta
βeta: I think this route goes up the face left of the cracks. This is a reasonable route and fits the name better. Why would you call parallel cracks a face? | βeta? |
|
Show beta
βeta: I think this route goes up the face left of the cracks. This is a reasonable route and fits the name better. Why would you call parallel cracks a face? |
|||
Logged Ascents
976 users have logged this
12 users have this on their wishlistPlease Login to view more details on the logged ascents