Search across the entire UKC database for Routes or Crags.
Your query will be matched against the following:
Name of Route/Crags
Name of Crags (for routes)
Name of Buttress (for routes)
Country
Rock Type eg. granite, gritstorne, sandstone etc
Route Type eg. trad, sport, winter etc
Description
Grade i.e. HVS, V3, IV etc
Tech Grade
First Ascent
E.g. Froggatt HVS-E1 ** Grit
Exact Phrases
Surround multiple words with double quotes to require a match on that phrase, eg "bat route" malham
Route-star ranges
Asterisks get special treatment in search queries. A sequence of them is considered to be a star rating for a route, so
* is
treated as 1-star, ** treated as 2-stars and *** treated as 3-stars. Typing just one sequence
creates a
search where the route is required to have at least that many stars, eg bat route ** will only return routes with
2
or more stars that also match the other search criteria bat and route.
Adding a dash and a second star sequence will create a range, eg *-** means "match routes with at least one and
at
most two stars".
Grade ranges
As above with stars, but with grades. Eg vs-e1 will match routes with a grade of either VS,
HVS or E1.
Date ranges (only years)
Date ranges will check against the first-ascent date field and require the route to have been put up between the start date and
the end date (inclusive). Eg 1970-1974 will match routes put up between 01-01-1970 and
31-12-1974. You should note that not all routes have had the first ascent date filled in, and these routes will
be
excluded from any search that includes date ranges, so you might not get the results you expect.
Difficulty for grade
We've calculated a value based on the grade voting system that assigns a route a value from one of:
soft
benchmark
hard
You can search for routes with these characteristics by using the special pipe-syntax, eg |soft|. If you don't wrap
the text in pipes, you'll just be searching the other text fields, so soft, with no pipes, would get you a match if
the text appeared in the description for example and |soft| will only match against routes that have been
marked as soft, and not check the other fields for the text.
A continuation of this system which uses the same syntax allows you to search for routes that are voted to be a completely
different grade using the following criteria:
eg |overgraded|. Note that this is based on votes, so if there are no votes for a route and you include one of these
criteria it
won't appear, regardless of whether it is in reality over or undergraded. Note also that whilst you can combine these with
soft/benchmark/hard, some combinations make no sense.
Regular expressions
Regular expressions, for those that don't know, are a way of describing patterns in strings. They are a very powerful tool for
searching and manipulating text, and completely unnecessary in this route search bar. However, if you do want to use them,
they are possible by surrounding the expression with forward slashes, eg /chris (?!craggs)/ will match any routes
that mention 'chris' but not those that mention 'chris craggs'. Or e2-e3
/crap|damp|horrible/ will return you a list of probably not classic routes.
Note that pure-regex queries are not allowed due to the cost of the queries against the database. You should always add any of
the other query types mentioned above if you're using a regex.
Negation
Finally, if you precede any text with a minus character you will negate it and require that it is not matched, eg -"mark
leach" bat malham.
A rarely climbed but excellent, sustained route just to the right of the classic Contamine. Apart from one small section, it’s only slightly harder than the Contamine and almost as good. In the interest of encouraging more people to have a go at the route, below is a detailed pitch-by-pitch description. Picture topos can be found in Piola’s Le Mont Blanc and Alpine Club guidebooks (neither are great).
Note that the first two pitches described are likely a slight variation on the original route, blending elements of Ras Bord, Le Macroscope and ground that is covered in neither of these. Nevertheless, they’re both excellent and fit logically with the route.
P1 – 40m, 6a+ – Start in a right-facing corner lined with a thin crack at the back that is situated about 15 metres to the right of the Contamine. On exiting the corner move right to a spike (slings often around this, visible from the ground). From the spike, step out left onto a slab (bolt). Climb the slab using parallel cracks until you reach a small overhang which you surmount on the left. Continue up a corner crack to a good belay
P2 – 40m, 6a+ – Move right and tackle the obvious corner. Power through the overhang and continue up a great finger crack until it peters out. Move leftwards along a slab to join a large ledge in common with the Contamine and Harold et Maud routes
P3 – 50m, 6b+ (6a+ A0) – Climb easier ground up and right, moving towards the arête. Reach a small ledge (optional belay). Look up at the piton several metres out of reach and wish there were some gear you could place before it. Make difficult slab moves towards the piton (6a+/b, no gear to prevent hitting the ledge in a fall) and breathe a sigh of relief as you clip the piton. Make a desperate slab move left, the crux of the route, which goes at around 6b+ (Piola says 6c+…). Those not wanting to risk falling on the piton may consider gingerly pulling on it, bringing the difficulty down to around 6a+. Continue up a flared crack until you can move back right onto the arête. Easy climbing in a great position leads to a small ledge in common with the Contamine route
P4 – 30m, 4b – Climb a wide crack on the edge of the arête to a good ledge (pitch in common with the Contamine route). Move to the back of the ledge and into the shade to make a belay above a jammed block
P5 – 45m, 6a+ – Climb the corner crack system on the right of the spur, taking the line of weakness. Continue up the obvious diedre ahead to a good belay at the top. Brilliant pitch though take care with loose rock in the first half. Optional belay after 25m
P6 – 50m, 4b – Continue up cracks near the crest of the spur and just to the right of the Contamine route
P7 – 60m, 5a – Continue up the crest, following the obvious line of weakness to the summit
Feedback comments are intended to give extra information about a route which may be helpful to other climbers.
This can include 'βeta' which is crucial information about the route which may be how to do a move, or tips about
hidden
holds or gear.
If you don't want to see βeta then select 'Always Hide βeta' and the comments will be hidden for you. You can
also
set this in your User Options.
If you read a comment that you think contains crucial βeta then you can mark it as 'βeta' using the flag on
the
right.
If you see something incorrectly marked as βeta, you can hide it by clicking on the word 'βeta:' on the
left.
You can also copy any of your previous personal ascent comments to Public Feedback if they contain useful general
information.
They can be edited before posting to remove
personal content if required.