Cliffhanger Canon Photo Comp - Win a Canon Powershot D10 worth £379

We have gone quite nuts recently with exclusive UKClimbing.com creative competitions. Express yourself and gear can be yours.

We had the Lyon Equipment Grand Day Out Competition with prizes worth £800 from La Sportiva, Petzl and Beal. You can see the winners at this UKC News item: Grand Day Out Winners - What more could a girl want?

Before that it was the THE METOLIUS COMPETITION: 25 years, 25 cams, 25 days where over £1,500 of Metolius cams were given away.

Just finished is the SMC Skye Guidebook Photo Competition where we got a chance to have photos published in the forthcoming Skye guidebook.

Just started is the WIN, WIN, WIN: Outdoor Research Competition: Midges - A Poem and Video with £750 worth of Outdoor Research gear to win.

You can read 20 poems about midges here: COMP: Outdoor Research: PART ONE: Midges - A Poem. Climbing literature is very much alive. Why not have a go yourself or if you have a video camera enter the Video advert competition.

Over the last year thousands of pounds of gear have been up for grabs and hundreds of climbers across the UK have expressed themselves creatively in UKClimbing.com competitions in partnership with climbing companies.

AND NOW YOUR CHANCE TO WIN a Canon PowerShot D10

Cliffhanger have teamed up with Canon and UKClimbing.com and are running a photo competition with a great prize, a Canon PowerShot D10, worth £379...and several runner up prizes including tickets to Cliffhanger. All you have to do is submit a photograph, or three, of cliffs.

Full details at Cliffhanger Canon Photo Comp - Win a Canon Powershot D10 worth £379 by Sarah Stirling


This post has been read 4,818 times

Return to Latest News


17 Jun, 2009
First four photos submitted:http://www.ukclimbing.com/photos/?category=5 Thank you. Mick
17 Jun, 2009
Please vote as they come in.
18 Jun, 2009
I often wondered where the designers got some of those images from! MattH
24 Jun, 2009
"The overall winner will be the photograph with the most reader votes" Is this regardless of what the average of those reader votes is? And does this not favour pictures that have been sitting on the galleries for a while already, at the expense of pictures submitted (or even taken!) for the competition? Or is that in fact part of the game? Seems to be somewhat open to "photo-trolling" wherein someone might put up a deliberately bad photo and invite votes and criticism in order to attain "the most reader votes". Just a thought... Cheers (there are some superb shots in the competition gallery that have never had a vote. One is from 2004 I think! I'm going to give it a score now)