Loading Notifications...

The Roaches Management Up For Grabs

© Jon Read

The future of one of Britain's premier crags is decided at the end of next week, as the Peak District National Park Authority (PDNPA) chooses which organisation will take over the management of The Roaches in Staffordshire. The authority, which has managed the publicly owned Roaches estate for more than 30 years, says it has to cut costs following the Government's spending review.


Rockhall Cottage and the Lower Tier  © Chris Craggs
Rockhall Cottage and the Lower Tier
© Chris Craggs

'One way we're adapting to financial cutbacks is to share more work with partners,' Jim Dixon, chief executive of the PDNPA said recently. 'Our budget from Defra is being cut from £8.2m in 2010-11 to £6.5m by 2014-15, so it makes sense to open the way for others to do what we cannot.'

Three organisations have made competing bids for management of The Roaches: the Staffordshire Wildlife Trust (SWT), the Land Trust and the National Trust.

Stakeholders, including the British Mountaineering Council (BMC), expect the PDNPA will choose the Staffordshore Wildlife Trust to take over the management of the Roaches. But UKC has learned that the front-runner in the three-way race is relying on financial support from Staffordshire Moorlands District Council - somewhat undermining the Government's aim to slash tax-payer support for England's national parks.

The SWT has promised to more than double the PDNPA's expenditure on the Roaches – currently around £25,000 – with the SWT itself committing £35,000 a year to the upkeep of the 395-hectare estate. An undisclosed sum is also promised from SMDC, essentially replacing one source of public funding with another. The SWT is also planning to appeal to other user groups, including the British Mountaineering Council.

Parking at the Roaches  © Jon Read
Parking at the Roaches
© Jon Read

The Conservative leader of Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Sybil Ralphs has been a vocal campaigner in demanding access to the Roaches remains unaffected by the government's decision to slash national park budgets. She declined to comment on her council's promised support of SWT's bid.

Of the other two organisations vying for the Roaches, the National Trust recently took over the management of the Eastern Edges with the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and co-operation with the BMC. The Land Trust has sufficient resources to manage the Roaches, but isn't considered to have a serious chance.

Henry Folkard, Peak District access representative for the British Mountaineering Council, said:

'They [the Land Trust] have no expertise of a site like the Roaches and we know nothing about them. You can join the National Trust and the Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, but you can't join the Land Trust. The Roaches is public property. There's an issue of accountability here.'

The BMC's Peak Area Newsletter for November 2011 has more on this.

BMC Chief executive Dave Turnbull told UKC:

'The BMC's preferred option is for the National Trust to get the Roaches. It's got the resources and it has lots of experience of recreation management. Historically, we've had a good working relationship with the Staffordshire Wildlife Trust and we could work with them if they are selected.'

The BMC resisted a bid by RSPB to manage the Eastern Edges on its own, preferring a broader-based coalition of interests. In its bid for the Roaches, the SWT promises to work with other stakeholders and hold public consultations but says it doesn't want a legally binding partnership.

The PDNPA says it has consulted widely to ensure the public's interest in the Roaches is maintained.

'These bodies often have long experience in sensitive land management, plus bigger budgets, access to grants, professional expertise and volunteers,' Jim Dixon said.

The authority has overseen a marked improvement in the condition of the Roaches estate in the last 30 years. Once part of the larger Swythamley estate and owned by the Brocklehurst family, the Roaches was in poor condition when it was bought for the nation by the Peak District National Park in 1980. It is now a Site of Special Scientific Interest.

Rockhall Cottage, originally an 18th century folly built into the crag, is leased to the BMC as a climbing hut. The park authority says that interest will be protected in any new agreement. PDNPA says it is unlikely it will sell the freehold to the Roaches, theoretically available to the right bidder, preferring a long or short leasehold. A spokeswoman told UKC: 'We can't comment on any of the proposals until a decision is made.'

Boulderers at the Roaches  © Jon Read
Boulderers at the Roaches
© Jon Read


This post has been read 9,312 times

Return to Latest News

Support UKC

We need your help.

UKClimbing is a vibrant web site with rich content and an amazing community. So far, all we've asked of you is that you visit and interact with the site but we are in uncertain times. We need to look at ways to keep the site moving forward whilst maintaining our key aim of allowing free access to everyone to our main content. The site will continue to be mainly funded by a subtle level of outdoor-only advertising but we now need extra support to ensure we can continue to provide the UKC that we all know and love.

You can help us by becoming a UKC Supporter. This can be in a small way or in a larger package that includes discounted products from our sister-publishing company Rockfax.

If you appreciate UKClimbing then please help us by becoming a UKC Supporter.

UKC Supporter

  • Support the website we all know and love
  • Access to a year's subscription to the Rockfax App.
  • 30% off Rockfax guidebooks
  • Show your support UKC Supporter badge on your profile and forum posts

17 Nov, 2011
As rate payer to Staffordshire Moorlands District Council does this mean I get preferential treatment at the Roaches (maybe some kind of private parking)??? Somehow I think not……………
17 Nov, 2011
I pay my Council Tax to SMDC and my membership subs to SWT. Do I get two parking places?
17 Nov, 2011
You're more likely to be rewarded with a pay and display machine.
17 Nov, 2011
Th Land Trust worry me. They look like they manage lots of post industrial restorations- little semi-urban park sites, not big areas of the uplands. I suspect they'll look and feel like park keepers, and the public accountability issue is important. There isn't any! They were spawned from English Partnerships. They'd be my go to guys if I had a colliery pit head to landscape, but if you want a flavour of their corporate ethos - try the "about us" bit of the website. It's full of the wrong sort of languuage for rural land managers, and their trustees have backgrounds in development agencies, private equity and development. Compare with, say, the National Trust. I don't know about staffs trust specifically, but other wildlife trusts have worked with climbers, cavers etc elsewhere - I've worked for one and I'm pretty relaxed about them, though I suspect the NT may be the best of the three for the scale of the site, and for finding a balance between users.
17 Nov, 2011
Actually, the Land Trust scare the Sh1t out of me as potential managers. Here's the "about Us" text. Do they sound like you could have a chat over the gate with them? The Land Trust provides a cost effective management solution for open space and green infrastructure. This land can deliver significant community benefits, improving health, social cohesion, providing an educational resource and uplifting the local economy. Our open spaces are a crucial part of the social landscape, delivering a range of significant benefits for residents and businesses. Safe and accessible open space allows communities to come together and individuals to develop and relax through physical activity and recreation. Well designed and maintained open spaces are outdoor classrooms, gyms and theatres. They change lifestyles and improve health and well-being, so we take them seriously. The most progressive companies understand that their economic future is fully entwined with the prosperity of the wider community, including the quality of the natural assets that surround them. But increasingly, businesses and government are recognising that quality open space has benefits beyond the obvious social and environmental impacts. It’s the commercial factors which are rapidly climbing up the agenda. Local economies benefit from the provision of high quality open spaces through enhanced inward investment and increased property values. This, in turn, creates greater commercial benefits. Meanwhile poor quality open space, dereliction and abandonment bring negative economic effects: putting off investment, reducing trade and footfall, and attracting anti-social behaviour. The agendas of Government, business and local communities are quickly and inexorably coming together to form a common view of the overlapping social, economic and environmental benefits of well-managed public open space. As both private and public organisations concentrate on their core businesses, the management of open space could be marginalised, and blight and dereliction could affect communities and landscapes across the country. The Land Trust is leading the charge for cost effective solutions to deliver high quality and sustainably maintained open space which preserves the character, value and benefits of our open spaces. http://www.thelandtrust.org.uk/business/businesschapter.asp?page=About_the_Land_Trust
More Comments
Facebook Twitter Email LinkedIn Pinterest