In reply to The New NickB:
> It was inevitable that someone would make this comment and thinking about it the odds of it being you were probably fairly short. I'll tell you what I was trying to convey.
As were the odds of you being the one to start such a thread
> 3. I wondered if I was out of touch, or that Channel 5 were plumbing the depths a little too deep.
Almost certainly a bit of both, the longer this goes on the more interest will wane so presumably the exposure (and maybe cash) reduces whilst the chances of ending up humiliating yourself stays the same. There must be a limit to how much work there is for former Celebrity/Jungle winners so the risk/reward ratio is not favourable for someone with even a moderately high profile. Looking at the list most seem under thirty so its also a generational thing, it'd have to be someone really famous for me to recognise a celeb under thirty and I expect these are mostly D list.
> 4. I wondered what other people thought.
I don't think the fact that the entrants aren't proper celebs matters too much, it makes them more relateable to the audience. People can probably aspire to being 'no-talent vaguely familiar name who appeared in a tabloid for a while' in a way they cannot aspire to being Tom Cruise (get me with my current popular culture touch points!)