In reply to Siward:
> Neither does the article tell us anything, at all, about the circumstances of the rapes they are talking about. It doesn't dispel any myths, it seems, alas, to be typical modern day under researched clickbait reporting by the Indy.
It might not have anything to do with journalism or the newspaper, surely it about the exhibition rather than the paper. Maybe the exhibition was simply that a display of clothes worn by rape victims, it might simply have been left at that; for the viewer to make up their own minds as to what that meant or represented. There doesn't really have to be any narrative about what's on display, like any "art" it's for the viewer to decide what they are seeing, or what's being represented.
I'd say marsbar is spot on, you can make your own conclusions and realise these aren't slutty women getting what they deserve/are asking for. This might be a more powerful message that actually saying the words.