In reply to sutty:
Aha! I knew someone would bite!
I don't deny that doing doing damage to structures could be considered illegal.
Your examples are bad ones, it is illegal to drive cars at speed because of the risk of injury to others, not because it damages any council structures; and there is no existing facility to do downhilling in Suffolk, to it is impossible to provide an alternative.
> What people want cannot always be provided.
Yet a policy of using attractive bait (a decent skatepark) to lure people away from breaking the law is well-established - not just with regards to skating. It has worked in Swansea, where the once popular skating hangout in the middle of town is now left for grannies to enjoy in peace, because the council built two new skatespots nearby, and listened to criticism and improved them when skaters complained they were crap.
> There was a new skate park installed half a mile from me and it closed in three months due to vandalism and trouble makers
And this is my biggest gripe - your (reasonable) assumption that, because it was skatepark, that the vandalism and trouble makers were skaters, is probably wrong. The likely situation is that, in a half baked effort to please skaters, the council spent as small an amount as possible in building a rubbish park, with no consultation of local skaters/skateshops at all. As a result, all the serious skaters (i.e. the ones good enough to actually cause any damage to civic structures - the vast majority are not!) ignored it because it was rubbish, and so it became a quiet spot for chavs to cause mayhem.
Brian - no worries I wasn't having a go at you and I'm perfectly chilled, but I'm always sucker for the opportunity to try and disprove the commonly held belief that just because you have a skateboard in your hand are a troublemaker, drop-out and a miscreant!