In reply to archiecb:
> (In reply to Owen W-G)
>
> I'm more confused about how that only equates to 9a/+
>
> At a lower grade a
> 6c boulder problem followed by a 7c+ route
> then another 6c problem
> then a pretty easy bit
> then a 6c+ route
>
> That has got to equate to more than slightly under one grade more than the hardest grade on the climb?
> doesn't it?
that really depends on if there are any rests between the diffrent sections.
if there are massive rests between all of the sections then your statement would be true. but if they are straight one after another, or only with a small rest between them, then the final difficulity will show this by bumping the grade up by more than just a single grade
at least thats how i think its done