In reply to CurlyStevo:
> (In reply to Cam Forrest)
> [...]
>
> please explain this quote from the article then:
>
> ""Meanwhile, The Met Office has said that below average temperatures in October mean there is a chance of upcoming overnight frosts, which would be seen predominantly in the Midlands and south-east.
> "
>
> The met office did not predict below average temperatures at the time this was issued (only at night in fact the were predicting unusualy sunny day time weather for much of the UK with around or above average temps)
I think you are agreeing with me, although you are phrasing this as though you are disagreeing.
There are 15 paragraphs in The Daily Mail article. One of them mentions the Met Office (your quote above), and it is a misquote, as you point out. In response, the Met Office said (in their blog) "It should be made clear that these forecasts for the coming months are not from the Met Office".
I think it is pretty clear that "the Daily Mail did not base their item on the Met Office", but on a number of independent forecasters. And who knows, but they might have misquoted them also. The Daily Mail's business is selling newspapers, not weather forecasting, lets face it.