In reply to pancakeandchips:
> Have you ever had a second actually fall on a microtraxion setup like this? I'm aware of the theory but I'm still a bit sceptical - wouldn't you still get pulled off by the sudden jerk on the rope before the cam engages? I guess that's why limited extension is important, but even so I imagine you'd feel a tug. Or is rope stretch enough to protect you?
Yes, once deliberately jumping off a few times when I was second (I told the leader first....). Another time when my second fell off, I had no idea, I think they told me that evening or the next day! I think it was actually falls onto a Kong Duck, but same deal. It's really a great system, allows simuling on terrain that (for me) would be unjustifiable otherwise.
The cam engages really quickly, there's no appreciable slippage.
You're right that this is why limited extension from the piece to the microtraxion is important. Imagine if the microtrax was attached to the piece of gear by a 240cm sling or similar. When the leader is going upwards the microtrax is lifted up by the friction of the rope running upwards through it, so it's about 200-240cm above the piece of gear. If the second falls the microtrax will end up 240cm below the piece. So about 4m ish of slack removed from the rope between the piece and the leader, which definitely could/would be enough to pull the leader off. If the microtrax is attached to the piece by a screwgate then the amount of slack that's removed between the piece and the leader is only a little more than double the length of the screwgate, which isn't realistically going to be enough to bother the leader. This is all explained in the choss boys article Ian linked above (highly recommend), but just thought I'd put a quick explanation here.
Post edited at 11:09