In reply to Michael Hood:
> but with no means to record it
The saying I’ve heard is - the best camera for “x” is the one you have with you at the time. Go for a bridge if that suits; I very nearly went for one a few years ago for a camera I could have in the car for those situations where I wanted a photo - similar to you found yourself with seeing the Hobby.
I only started bird photography this year, but for what it’s worth I went straight into MFT camera/lens and don’t regret that choice. I knew the limitations and just try for the best photo the camera/lens is capable for (which is more than my ability). One thing for me that was important/vital was good image stabilisation. Useful for the longer reach if that is something you will use.
All cameras have their limitations; if you accept that, I think a bridge camera could be a good option to start. If you’re intending to do more photography in future, however, I reckon look ahead and decide on dslr/mirrorless cameras to save money in the longer run.
I’ve read some bridge cameras now save raw files if you want flexibility to post process.