In reply to andyjohnson0:
> Seriously, whats wrong with Climber? I still have a subscription, so I'd like to know what I'm missing...
It's not as bad as I'm making out. However I agree with what Pebbles and Deacondeacon say. The photography isn't as good. The articles are a bit dull. It's often very much a 'Here's 5 Must Do Routes at Stanage' vibe to it. I much prefer the interesting articles in Climb, while I'll probably never climb at some of the odd places they go to, it's much more interesting than reading about another mainstream UK venue. However Andy, if that's what you like, then that's great as well.
I'd give climber another year or two on it's current 6 month schedule, before it goes the same way. It's sad I guess, but the world has changed and while a tablet isn't quite the same, I think it's better for magazine still information. I still like proper books.
I still think there's scope for a high quality (alpinist esque) journal 'magazine' in the UK. Probably only quarterly. I wonder if Ian Parnell is reading this? Hint, hint!
As a side note, only 3 dislikes? C'mon UKC, you can do better!