An earlier post ‘The General Rubbish State of Plastic’ comparing the Sheffield climbing walls got me thinking about what I like and dislike about indoor walls. Living in London means access to at least 10 climbing walls of varying size and character. Over time I’ve climbed at about 6 of them, normally opting for those closer to work or home.
I’d agree with TheClimbingWallCrictic about the spread of of competition style route setting but probably get more annoyed by the parkour style routes. Then again, I am a grumpy old git who who enjoys trad climbing. As such, I’m relatively weak, which means I judge low grade problems/routes harshly. To the point that I think if setters can’t set interesting easier routes that still make one think, they’re kinda useless! Conversely, I’m thrilled when I find engaging easy problems, a sign of a talented route setter. And another thing is grade progression. I’m not too fussed about what grading system is used but I do get annoyed when theres a perceived massive difference between grade bands.
I understand walls are going to have peak periods that will be really busy, I live in London and climbing’s increased popularity is noticeable. But what I find annoying is where wall owner/managers/designers have not taken this into consideration and at least thought about customer flow vs climbing areas.
Lastly, I appreciate circuit boards with gradual increases in grades, reset occasionally, and of course, the true test of all walls is how good the coffee is.
So, what are the most important things that you look for or would like to see at your local climbing wall and what are the things you really don’t like?