In reply to Robert Durran:
> (In reply to Dave)
> [...]
>
> Those look great. Are they particularly good examples or typical?
Fairly typical, I didnt play around with the images before putting them on here. I did notice that a good slide results in a good scan, a less than perfect slide results in a fairly poor scanned image. I'm no expert on this, and maybe it's possible to do all sorts of corrections, but my impression is its only worth scanning the good ones. An example of a less good scan is this
http://www.ukclimbing.com/images/dbpage.php?id=159310 where the original exposure was perhaps not quite on.
When I look at my slides now I realise how much more difficult it was to take good pictures with that medium....