In reply to Liam M:
> This is much what I was told by a (private) surgeon concerning mine - unless it's very painful or severely curling your fingers in they're reluctant to do anything to it as it may regrow and cause the hand to curl in again, and if they've already done surgery on it repeated operations become more difficult.
Needle aponeurotomy is minimally invasive and in my experience well worth a go, depending on where the main contractures are. Mine were in the finger and close to its base and the whole procedure took about 10 minutes. My finger is now completely straight and functional. I can still feel that there are some limitations in odd movements but I think I had unusual flexibility before the contractures originally developed.
I had about a 45 degree flex in my little finger for about two years, I guess. My main concern was that I was damaging my knuckle climbing and that I would end up with scarring or maybe a serious infection in the joint (as well as struggling with the thin finger jamming I used to enjoy).
Since the procedure I have noticed some pain in the PIP joint, which I think is as result of the previous immobility. This makes me wonder about the long-term joint damage that may result from the lack of full range of movement. It seems obvious to me that the longer the condition persists the more likely it is that the joints will be damaged and maybe this should be factored in to the advice to do nothing until the contracture is severe. Before I found the right person to treat me I had some pretty ropey advice from non-specialists (including hand surgeons) along the lines of waiting until it was really bad. They also said that I would probably only get back about 70% of my flexibility, which didn't make waiting for it to be even worse seem very sensible!
A lot depends on where the fibrosis is (and the confidence and skill of the surgeon). I was warned that the incidence of recurrence is high, but then there isn't really any reason why NA can't be repeated as required. So far, there's no sign of the contracture redeveloping. However, if the fibrosis is widepread or deep in the fascia of the palm, then more complicated open surgery may be required and then the argument may change.
I don't have any experience of the collagenase treatment but I was advised that it was more painful and carried a greater risk of collateral damage but, again, a lot depends on how widespread the issue is and the anatomy involved. It was described as the second line treatment where NA isn't suitable (with open surgery the third line).
Post edited at 11:57