In reply to galpinos:
> 1. These products are a loss leader. They are not intended to sell in large numbers nor make the brand money. They establish the brand credibility and encourage people to buy into the brand, but at a lower price point, where margin is higher and volume is expected.
Oh absolutely, who in their right mind is going to by a £500 quid rucksack and then thrash themselves in a Scottish chimney.
> 2. You have to be a big enough company to produce these loss leader type product. Smaller brands are restricted, they need to make what sells, and "top end alpinism" is a very small market in which the entire customer base is either sponsored or broke. TNF can do it, as can Patagonia and Arc'teryx. Mountain Equipment and Montane, not so much
I would argue that Mountain Equipment is much bigger than Montane and in terms of it's use of Gore tex alone has one of the largest offerings of waterproof jackets and when you look at the lightline which is probably one of the most SMU'd products in the UK I don't think they're broke at all just probably have a more sensible business model which doesn't involve loss leaders as they are so established.
> 3. New products does not always mean innovation. There's a reason, for example, the R1 Hoody/Eclipse Hoody is still in the Patagonia/Mountain Equipment range. They are fantastic bits of kit not yet bettered. Don't praise change for the sake of change.
Personally I'm not a fan of Patagonia, I find their products dull but that's me.
> 4. As the world continues to heat up and we look at our habits and what needs to change, consumption is right up there. Maybe "something new and snazzy" is no longer the way forward!
I do agree with this and mass consumerism needs to slow down BUT are we now not allowed to even admire kit and innovation? I'm not going to buy any of this Barney the outdoor dinosaur outfit as it's way to expensive but I think it's flipping cool. There's a strange balance between sustainable outdoors and producing kit that will last the test of time. I know so many people who have a piece of kit that is at least 15 years old and has never failed and will probably go on for another 10 years. On the other hand the newer fabrics with flurocarbon free DWRs and lightweights are, perhaps, not as sustainable as they won't last as long just on paper they have all the credentials. When I worked for Haglofs they where doing amazing things with Recycled gore tex and actually trying to strip the membranes off the face fabric to try and recycle it.
> The North Face has always produced great kit, they just get shunned by punters worried their peer status as "crag hard man" will be affected by the fact they have the same jacket as the lads from the local estate.