In reply to Anybody who hasn't got bored and wandered off:
Eddinabox's not especially helpful, not comprehensive, slightly boring selection of tips for setting cryptic clues.
Cryptic clues, at least in crosswords, should either contain a definition part and a cryptic part, or sometimes two definitions but omit the cryptic part, or as here be themed so the definition part may be omitted if the setter wishes.
Clues should always be grammaticaly correct when read (rather than spoken) as a sentence, a favourite of crossword setters is ‘
flower’ which will make sense in the whole clue if taken to mean flower as in daisy or chrysanthemum, but when taken crypticaly it will actually refer to a river, in the sense that a river is something that flows. Cryptic units within the clue should also be grammaticaly correct. - Here's one:
Flower sounds irritatin'. (6) if you read that anywhere else you would assume I meant a plant, but the answer is Itchen, which is a river in Hampshire, (I have got away with Itchen not being an exact sound alike for itching because I left the g off irritating in the clue.) In the Chumbawamba clue ‘
sheep, say’ was really pushing the limits, it should probably have been
what sheep, say or
sound of sheep. In Dom's ‘
Prince and the New Power Generation’ clue (sorry Dom) ‘
non-confusion’ just doesn't mean ‘
no n - confusion’ a better way (if
cold fusion had been in the answer) might have been to say ‘
pointless confusion’ ‘n’ being a point of the compass or ‘
confusion missing unknown’ ‘n’ is used to represent an unknown value in equations.
A clue should be precise, there should be nothing in the clue unused by the solution and equally the solution should not contain any letters that are not accounted for in the clue. - Simply missing out ‘
and the’ is not allowed.
The order is also important, if the cryptic parts of the clue are not in the order they appear in the answer there should be something to indicate this: In the Chumbawamba clue I used ‘
after friend’ to indicate that
ba(w)a should follow
chum.
If part of the clue doesn't have exactly the same meaning as the answer, this should be indicated, often a question mark is used to do this. This one is a bit hard to explain, if the definition part is a little bit cryptic it is often indicated by placing it at the end of the clue and adding a question mark, or if part of the clue is an example of the corresponding part of the answer then a word like
say or
perhaps may be used. - In Dom's clue ‘
kids’ means children, it doesn't mean generation, but it is an example of a generation so ‘
kids say’ or ‘
say kids’ would have been fine.
Sounds like type clues should sound exactly like, so the clue gives a real word (or possibly phrase) that sounds exactly like another real word that is spelt differently. - Consider
beerfart with the first ‘r’ removed and
Beefheart and contrast it with
cofusion and
cold fusion, I would possibly have tried something along the lines of ‘
swapping large old pennies for unknown in confusion’, large being ‘l’, old pennies being ‘d’ as in L/s/d - pounds shillings and pence and unknown being ‘n’.
It is considered unfair if you cannot get straight from part of the clue to the corresponding part of the answer directly, that is to say there should be no intermediate step that would stand as a clue in its own right. In the Thompson Twins clue the anagram part was pushing the boundaries of this rule, which is why I added a definition part.
Cold fusion is a good clue for ‘
new power’ but it should have been used directly in the clue rather than expecting the solver to work it out and then solve it.
A clue should have only one answer, if two similar words could satisfy the clue then the clue should be improved.
Strive to make the clue elegant, it is best if it reads well, as if it were a complete sentence or remark, it is analogous to style of ascent, you can dog a route or on-sight it, you get to the top either way, but you get more respect for the on-sight. Good setters often manage to create clues that form a conceptually consistent construction, punctuation may be used to achieve this and obscure the correct breakdown of the clue. - I tried to do this with the Tubthumping clue, ‘
belay devices dropping climber from the Lakes living in Edinburgh’ could have been made far simpler by saying ‘
belay devices, losing points’ but I wanted to get in two climbing references.
A good clue should take at least as long to set as it does to solve, probably longer. - The one I'm working on at the moment has taken about three days so far, and I still need to figure out how to get rid of one more letter.
Lastly, nobody likes a smart arse setter or a boring setter (smart arse setter - one who sets clues that are too difficult for you, boring setter - one who sets clues that are too easy for you)