In reply to Jamie B:
> (In reply to Andrew Wilson)
>
> [...]
>
> As I pointed out, there's no harm in it. But I do think that seconding is pretty inconsequential and arguably not worth logging at all.
You'd better tell Hazel Findlay to get back on Golden Gate then!
http://www.ukclimbing.com/news/item.php?id=64696
"
Jack: What are your thoughts on the 'One person does all the leading' style extolled by the Hubers?
Hazel: I guess it's cool if you want something to be entirely your own achievement. But for me, climbing has always been about other people as well, about working in a team. The fact is that, unless you are free or aid soloing, you have to work as a team anyway, so why not share the experience and share the free climbing. Also, a lot of the pitches on granite are safe and not very bold, so it doesn't really make much difference to the difficulty if you are leading or seconding. On the Golden Gate, the crux pitches are mostly either bolted. downclimbs or traverses, so in those cases it really didn't make a difference. And we both lead the Golden Desert pitch, which is more trad style."