In reply to pasbury:
Agree - the shortlist would be challenging! What's that tiny little one on Dartmoor - only about twenty feet but golden? I'd wanted to do it for decades and of course soloing meant that it was all over in seconds. But seconds of pure joy. So we did it again... and again. You've still got to take it seriously though; it's no pushover.
I just can't understand why Ken didn't bring VS Rock out straight after Hard Rock. All the Hard Rock tickers would have bought it too - and it would have attracted a separate market of VS rather than Extreme climbers.
Obviously the current standard of photography is superlative. Getting strong enough essays would, I suspect, be harder. The best accounts might come from those who climbed VS cracks sans cams (or even hexes?) when VS was a grade to be respected - if not feared.
Although I'm hopelessly out of touch, it seems that, after years of video hegemony, we're now in a golden age of climbing books in the UK. Obviously Peak Rock was pretty good. The excerpts that I've seen of the forthcoming Gogarth book are stunning, lots and lots of grassroots accounts, with brilliant editorial commentary, the whole adding up to much, much more than the sum of the parts.
It's also interesting how quickly people can get books out these days. A while back, Dave Flanagan was wondering which routes to include in his Irish select guide - and then suddenly it was out, with amazing photography - this in a country where it hardly ever stops raining!
I'm far too knackered but you - or someone else - should go for VS Rock. I've long thought it an unpicked plum and, as you've mentioned it, grab it.
Mick
P.S. Although I'm hopelessly out of touch and must have missed some gems, the BMC guidebook 'Over The Moors' edited by Martin Kocsis, with Ian Carr and Grimer is one of the best I've ever seen. I gather there were rows about accuracy but, with untold thousands of facts, you could never get everything right. Have it on the table in front of me - joy beyond compare.