In reply to Daniel Heath:
> (In reply to mloskot)
>
> I think it makes sense that in cutting edge sport climbing
> people have pre-clipped quick draws.
I'm not questioning it's sensibility and validity.
However, once upon a time, someone defined what does climbing on-sight mean and what it requires.
Today, we see many climbing attempts looking similar but slightly different considering the original rules of on-sight. The definition of on-sight is being bent towards needs of contemporary climbing, needs such as being able to perform in 101% of human abilities on rock.
May be angle of this bent is small, it raises questions and doubts. Simply, perhaps there is a need for different label leaving on-sight in its original form.