In reply to keith sanders:
This is always going to be a hugely personal question and based on what our personal priorities and our life experiences. As this is UK Climbing, climbing is going to be an important priority, but for many possible not the most important, even then the type of climbing will have a significant impact on location. Then we have to look at other interests outside of climbing in addition to the need to work and issues around affordability of the lifestyles that different places might offer and finally and perhaps for many most personally, the need to be near friends and family. I’m also keeping things to a British perspective, basically because that is what I know.
I’m in to trad climbing and a bit of mountaineering, so my ideal location would have a range of lowland and mountain crags, alpine peaks, perfect summers and cold crisp winters; obviously that place also has extensive formal gardens fertilised with unicorn shit, so I will settle for lots of evening cragging options, mountains within an easy drive and easy access to an international airport.
I’m also in to running, both road and fell, so somewhere with lots of local clubs and a good racing scene as well as being able to run out of my front door and in to the hills is important; I do a bit of road biking as well, so again a few hills and ideally roads where drivers are used to seeing bikers. Finally, I still need to work, which for me means being in or close to a major metropolitan area, I also love cities for their bustle, history, architecture and culture (both high and low) so whilst being in the city isn’t essential, being relatively close is.
I have often thought about what it would be like to live in the west of Scotland, particularly on Skye, the Lake District and in Cornwall, but for me, all of them only offer very small pieces in the jigsaw.
Maybe in time, when work considerations are less of an issue and the draw of the city may have reduced a little, somewhere just south of the Lakes may appeal; Silverdale or Cartmel perhaps.
For now, living at the foot of the Pennines, but a 12 minute train ride in to the centre of Manchester works perfectly. From a climbing perspective, I have half a dozen crags I can get to on foot, dozens within half an hour in the cars and hundreds within an hour; the Lakes and North Wales are between an hour and a half and two hours away and the west of Scotland is doable for the weekend; the convenience of Manchester airport also means that a long weekend in the Alps is also an option.
I could choose from one of a dozen or more local running clubs, I could race almost every day of the year, both road and fell, hardly travelling, but also with easy access to those climbing locations, which are often also great running locations. The Tour de France passed a few miles from my house on 2014 and I have many routes of 50-100 miles that give me wonderful riding.
I had to laugh at the poster who described Manchester as a food and culture black hole, the city is famous for its lack of Michelin stars, having eaten in quite a few Michelin stared restaurants, I would say that was an oversight by the Michelin Guide rather than any real criticism of the culinary offer of the city, which is great, not only in terms of the fairly narrow parameters of what Michelin judge, but also premium casual dining and street food. Even that ignores the Michelin stars and other brilliant culinary experiences within pretty close proximity. As for a cultural black hole, the poster is clearly a complete moron. Whatever your cultural references are, the city has something to offer.
That is a very long winded way of saying, where I live works for me. It’s the best place for me to live, it might not be for anyone else.
Post edited at 12:10