In reply to slab_happy:
Using mindfulness in it's Buddhist sense the only reason you would knowingly put yourself in a stressful situation is if it for the right moral reasons, climbing certainly doesn't come under this. Samadhi practice, which is the foundation of mindfulness practice is about calming the mind, in order to achieve this voluntarily putting yourself in stressful situations is not helpful. Mindfulness might be helpful in a stressful situation but it would be pretty stupid of someone to put themselves in a stressful situation to practice mindfulness.
That is essentially why secular mindfulness is vacuous, because it ignores the ethical framework in which mindfulness exists. Yes mindfulness is very beneficial, Buddhist monks test off the scale in terms of happiness, but it is most beneficial from within a framework of teaching and ethics. Traditionally practice of Sila (virtue) is a prerequisite to practicing mindfulness in Buddhist tradition.
Kabat-Zinn and others essentially exhibit frontage, backstage behavior about mindfulness. He says different things to different audiences. Others are more brash and open about it which is especially galling given than proselytising is forbidden in Buddhism. Research into mindfulness is also often carried out by a cabal of his followers who very much have 'skin in the game'. The key point is that K-Z and others essentially view the Buddhist conception of mind as something which is true and that this truth is knowable by direct experience. Secular mindfulness programs promote this conception of the mind and present it as innate truth. Now I think it is true, however I don't think it's truth is an open and shut case and I certainly don't think that it should be taught as innate truth out of context. It clashes with a conception of mind and suffering from the Abrahamic faiths and it also clashes with some secular liberal ideas about suffering and other secular philosophies of mind. To practice mindfulness you do have to accept certain truths which may be counter to your own personal beliefs about the mind and suffering.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011) ‘Some reflections on the origins of MBSR, skillful means, and the trouble with maps’, Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), pp. 281–306.
Makes for pretty interesting reading
Brown, C. G. (2016) ‘Can “secular” Mindfulness Be Seperated from Religion?’, in Purser, R. E., Burke, A., and Forbes, D. (eds) Hanbook of Mindfulness: Culture, Context, and Social Engagement. Springer Switzerland, pp. 75–94.
As does this, which is where references to stealth Buddhism come from.
Dr Miguel Farias has written interesting stuff on the clinical bias in mindfulness
Bodhi, B. (2011) ‘What Does Mindfulness Really Mean? A Canonical Perspective’, Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), pp. 19–39.
Is a very good account of Buddhist mindfulness
Sobczak, L. R. and West, L. M. (2013) ‘Clinical Considerations in Using Mindfulness- and Acceptance-Based Approaches With Diverse Populations: Addressing Challenges in Service Delivery in Diverse Community Settings’, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. Elsevier B.V., 20(1), pp. 13–22.
Give a good account of some of the tensions amongst those of different beliefs when using Mindfulness in the clinic
Post edited at 10:13