In reply to Robert Durran:
> >........ if you put the routes 'on the ground' at the bottom of your garden, and had to judge them objectively.
> But if that's your idea of "objectively" then you may as well take it to its logical conclusion by exactly replicating the technicality on indoors plastic and judging the quality of the route on that basis. Most people would regard this as absurd; the texture of the rock and the aesthetics of the suroundings are as much a part of a route as the actual moves.
Well, OK, but the technical climbing remains a very important part of it. (And of course any hypothetical imitation would exactly reproduce the rock, including its texture) But I also agree that it's very hard to unravel and separate the different ingredients. If I had to list my top ten, highest quality climbing experiences they would probably be something like: 1. the round of Coire Lagan, starting up Sron na Ciche, over Sgurr Sgumain and Alastair, then Thearlich, Collie's Ledge and the mindboggling An Stac ridge leading to the In Pin. 2. Clach Glas-Blaven Traverse 3. Vector, 4. Cenotaph Corner. 5. Kipling Groove. 6. Cemetery Gates 7. West Flank Route, Arran 8. Debauchery, High Tor, 9. Five Finger Exercise, Cratcliffe 10. Hate at Bowles (or quite a few things at High Rocks, frankly). I.e. an almost ridiculously diverse bunch of incomparable routes.
Ooh, and that misses out all the Alps too! My very last proper climb, with Freda, soloing up the south ridge of Bispen in the Romsdal area of Norway in 2009, was a pretty special occasion too.
Post edited at 16:18